Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror Movie Discussion > Classic Horror Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #61  
Old 11-11-2009, 07:21 PM
ChronoGrl's Avatar
ChronoGrl ChronoGrl is offline
HDC Idol

 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waltham, MA
Posts: 8,566
I look at this thread title and think, "Is that a serious question?" How can people who consider themselves true horror fans possibly like the TV miniseries better?
__________________


Join my Facebook Horror Group!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 11-13-2009, 07:01 PM
p1zl3's Avatar
p1zl3 p1zl3 is offline
Minister of the Sinister
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChronoGrl View Post
I look at this thread title and think, "Is that a serious question?" How can people who consider themselves true horror fans possibly like the TV miniseries better?
To each their own... Horror is all about what gets the pulse racing for you. To some that's a haunting whisper in an abandoned house, to some it's the shimmer of a freshly sharpened axe, but either way, it's effective. The TV version of The Shining although lacking in elements had some very eerie parts that shouldn't go unappreciated...
__________________

--The Piz is watching you--
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 11-13-2009, 07:06 PM
Doc Faustus's Avatar
Doc Faustus Doc Faustus is offline
Mephistophiliac

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,999
Send a message via AIM to Doc Faustus
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChronoGrl View Post
I look at this thread title and think, "Is that a serious question?" How can people who consider themselves true horror fans possibly like the TV miniseries better?
I do. I think Kubrick's film was sterile, tyrannical and traitorous to its source material. I'm with King on it. It goes so far as to change the protagonist. Also, Steven Weber starts off sane and goes crazy, Jack Nicholson starts off crazy and gets slightly crazier. The tv version is more of an onslaught and puts the focus on Danny, where it belongs.
__________________
Horror and Bizarro novelist and editor
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 11-14-2009, 07:48 PM
ChronoGrl's Avatar
ChronoGrl ChronoGrl is offline
HDC Idol

 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waltham, MA
Posts: 8,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Faustus View Post
I do. I think Kubrick's film was sterile, tyrannical and traitorous to its source material. I'm with King on it. It goes so far as to change the protagonist. Also, Steven Weber starts off sane and goes crazy, Jack Nicholson starts off crazy and gets slightly crazier. The tv version is more of an onslaught and puts the focus on Danny, where it belongs.
I think that it works conceptually, but not actually. I also really hated what they did to Jack's character in the end, but you're right; it's more like the original story... And I thought that the Kubrik movie had a better ending than the book.
__________________


Join my Facebook Horror Group!
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 11-14-2009, 08:02 PM
Doc Faustus's Avatar
Doc Faustus Doc Faustus is offline
Mephistophiliac

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,999
Send a message via AIM to Doc Faustus
I don't think the tv version is a masterpiece or even particularly well made, but for those who cannot be bothered to read or want to see what shit in the book looks like, it's better. I can't stand Kubrick in general. He kind of barks orders at his audience. Like, take a Clockwork Orange for instance. The book is an ethical debate. The film is a sermon.
__________________
Horror and Bizarro novelist and editor
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:19 AM.