Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror Movie Discussion > Classic Horror Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-20-2006, 05:22 PM
melaniepants's Avatar
melaniepants melaniepants is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rochester
Posts: 144
Send a message via MSN to melaniepants
Stephen Kings The Shining

I seen the other version of the shining the one with Jack N, and everyone says the stephen king version is better is that true?
__________________
Lets Get Down To the Knitty Gritty---Nacho Libre
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2006, 05:36 PM
Roderick Usher's Avatar
Roderick Usher Roderick Usher is offline
HDC Sole Survivor!!

 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Underneath the Bed
Posts: 7,012
no...........
__________________
"Little, vicious minds abound with anger and revenge, and are incapable of feeling the pleasure of forgiving their enemies."
Earl of Chesterfield

"A man that studieth revenge keeps his own wounds green, which otherwise would heal and do well."
Francis Bacon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2006, 05:49 PM
Despare's Avatar
Despare Despare is offline
Evil Puppy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 12,279
I liked them both a lot to be honest. Stanley's version is very well done but the mini-series brings the book to life very nicely.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2006, 05:54 PM
PR3SSUR3's Avatar
PR3SSUR3 PR3SSUR3 is offline
Smack My Titties
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brussels
Posts: 2,196
Yes the two stories are told quite differently, with the miniseries being closest to the original novel.

Steven Weber is less psychotic from the outset than Jack Nicholson, though Kubrick's film has some very nice shocks indeed.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-20-2006, 06:15 PM
kpropain's Avatar
kpropain kpropain is offline
BMXICAN
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Somewhere Outside The Realm Of Hell
Posts: 9,200
Like others have said the mini series was closer to the book...But the version with Nicholson was way better imo...
__________________







Jesus had a tough life. I read about that guy. Jesus is the only guy that ever came back from the dead that didn't scare the F--- out of everybody!
-Sam Kinison
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-21-2006, 08:26 AM
Burning in Hell's Avatar
Burning in Hell Burning in Hell is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montréal, Québec, Canada
Posts: 450
King's version might be closer to his book, but it can't touch the Kubrick movie which is a brilliant adaptation.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-21-2006, 09:15 AM
PR3SSUR3's Avatar
PR3SSUR3 PR3SSUR3 is offline
Smack My Titties
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brussels
Posts: 2,196
So are you saying Kubrick managed to improve on the book with his lack of haunted topiary animals, death of Halloran, blood-filled lifts, jittery flake of a wife and menacing lead character who was clearly mad from the outset?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-21-2006, 09:26 AM
Despare's Avatar
Despare Despare is offline
Evil Puppy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 12,279
You really have to watch both of these because while some people do truly enjoy the Kubrick version more there are those people who say that anything Kubrick did was a masterpiece.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-21-2006, 09:31 AM
PhilnEdee's Avatar
PhilnEdee PhilnEdee is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 465
Send a message via Yahoo to PhilnEdee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Despare View Post
You really have to watch both of these because while some people do truly enjoy the Kubrick version more there are those people who say that anything Kubrick did was a masterpiece.
yea...like the 2nd part of Full Metal Jacket...blah!

The Shining on TV is probably the only S. King TV movie I have enjoyed, but it doesn't have quite the dread/darkness you feel from Nicholson in the Kubrick...(and it could be because of the TV restrictions, because I thought the Weber guy was great) both films are well done IMO.
__________________
She's a new breed of vampire...her fangs are in her vagina.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-21-2006, 12:38 PM
Burning in Hell's Avatar
Burning in Hell Burning in Hell is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montréal, Québec, Canada
Posts: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR3SSUR3 View Post
So are you saying Kubrick managed to improve on the book with his lack of haunted topiary animals, death of Halloran, blood-filled lifts, jittery flake of a wife and menacing lead character who was clearly mad from the outset?
I'm saying that the Kubrick movie is superior to the King movie. There might be parts of the book missing, but the creepiness and atmosphere of the Kubrick version is unparalleled in my opinion. As for the King movie, it might have been more faithful, and an ok movie, but it suffered from a lack of atmosphere and a very bad casting choice. Hell, that kid had "Disney adds" written all over his face!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:15 AM.