Exorcist II

[avenger00soul]

Originally posted by _Leatha_Face_
theres a 3rd one to

There's only 2 Chud films. Are you still talking about The Exorcist?

[Necromancer]

i didn't even understand the first Exorcist movie, the demon was in this figure but why did they have it???

[Vodstok]

hoo boy, here we go.....
Only 2 chuds, second one was actually supposed to be funny. Think critters or gremlins, but far worse than those could ever hope to be.

Exorcist 2:
Linda Blair is possesed by Pazuzu AGAIN.Richard burton is trying to exorcise him this time. Talks to Darth Vader about Locusts, because he was the kid mentioned in the first movie when the preists are discussing father Merrin's experience with exorcism.

Bunch of crap happens, utterly lacks anything that made the first one work. If it werent for the fact that the plots of both sequals to the exorcist were written by the same guy as the original (William Peter Blatty), i would place them in the same category as the Jaws sequals, which were stillborn.

The first exorcist had nothing to do with a posessed statue. The statue at the beginning is representative of the demoan that posseses Reagan.

The origianl is about a struggle between good and evil, fought in the body of a 12 yr old girl. It also represented a test of faith and ultimate redemtion for Father Karras. the second was an attempt to capitalize on it's popularity. It was pigeon shit soaked in cheap beer, spilled on pork flavored jello.

[Signs515]

I own Exorcist 1&3 and I love both of these movies, I've only seen parts of the second one though. One part I did see that actually looked pretty good was the scene in Africa with the possessed child, that looked pretty freaky. BTW, anyone have anymore news on the Exorcist 4?

[Evisceration]

Originally posted by Vodstok
hoo boy, here we go.....
Only 2 chuds, second one was actually supposed to be funny. Think critters or gremlins, but far worse than those could ever hope to be.

Exorcist 2:
Linda Blair is possesed by Pazuzu AGAIN.Richard burton is trying to exorcise him this time. Talks to Darth Vader about Locusts, because he was the kid mentioned in the first movie when the preists are discussing father Merrin's experience with exorcism.

Bunch of crap happens, utterly lacks anything that made the first one work. If it werent for the fact that the plots of both sequals to the exorcist were written by the same guy as the original (William Peter Blatty), i would place them in the same category as the Jaws sequals, which were stillborn.

The first exorcist had nothing to do with a posessed statue. The statue at the beginning is representative of the demoan that posseses Reagan.

The origianl is about a struggle between good and evil, fought in the body of a 12 yr old girl. It also represented a test of faith and ultimate redemtion for Father Karras. the second was an attempt to capitalize on it's popularity. It was pigeon shit soaked in cheap beer, spilled on pork flavored jello.

She's possesed? She seems fine to me? What the fuck, that doesn't make any sense! Then how do they goto the house and she's posessed...yet...she isn't.

Fuck this movie.

And Exorcist IV comes out in April I believe. That's all I know.

[Vodstok]

see, thats how i felt. I never got the impression that she was possesed, but the descriptions of the movie insist that she was. A further testament to it's shittiness...

[sleepaway]

Exorcist II: Well it does suck, but I've seen a lot worse. It's hard to follow and it's all locusts and shit. The saving grace is Linda Blair who gives a good performance and has great onscreen charisma.

CHUD is one of those eighties guilty pleasures and I kinda like it. CHUD 2: BUD THE CHUD is just shamefully awful and it's played for laughs too. Nasty.

I own both Exorcist 2 and Chud! Oops.