|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#21
10-05-2004, 04:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Anyway, I have no problem with gays. Live and let live, just so long as they dont force me to become part of their culture, or to watch them....Im fine 
|
|
#22
10-05-2004, 04:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah I agree with The Egg. If you want to get married in a church it should be by that churches way. The whole idea of marriage is that two people join together and become one for the purpose of serving God.
__________________
I was blind but now I see
|
|
#23
10-06-2004, 01:38 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
In some cases and countries, the government is more open-minded than the church on that subject.
__________________
the illusion of fire is so perfect that it burns http://www.terror.ca
|
|
#24
10-06-2004, 02:46 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
well marriage is a mainly a religion thing. but you dont need to involve religion when ya get married now days. but since its mainly a religous thing. i dont see how the goverment can stop fags from marrying. cause ithink if religion has to stay out of politics. politics should fuck off from religion. but then again that might nt happen since most religions are against homos getting married. which is ok by me. but if the goverment is gonna ban fags/dykes from getting married then they should at least acknowledge same sex relationships. that way when one spouse dies he at least would have the right to leave his b/f what ever wanted to in his will. without some narrow minded family member stepping in and taking what these two might have spent a life time aquiring togther. who knows...? who cares....? not i.
|
|
#25
10-06-2004, 03:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
lol and this guy you know, I dont get it, how can he not know he's gay himself, and yet others do?? are the other people gay and reckon they can make him go gay??
|
|
#26
10-06-2004, 03:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
My peace:
I've been in (bridesmaid) a non "valid" homosexual wedding. Beautiful. Religion and politics don't mix. Besides, the world is way over populated as it is. Too many gay people to believe its not natural... And finally the first "people" on this planet were single celled organisms. I'm not sure they were very political. (At the risk of me bringing my religion, Wicca, into this...I believe in Evolution). That's my visit to this thread
__________________
By the time you're twenty-five they will say you've gone and blown it. By the time you're thirty-five I must confide you will have blown them all
|
|
#27
10-06-2004, 04:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
the illusion of fire is so perfect that it burns http://www.terror.ca
|
|
#28
10-06-2004, 05:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I dont think it's natural.
Man was created through evolution and ended with a penis, woman was created through evolution and ended with a vagina.....now in order to create baby, man must insert penis in to woman vagina, there is no other natural means to do this. Any other alternative to creating a baby other than inserting penis into a vagina is abnormal and not natural, thus the conclusion of this story indicates that man has a natural use for his penis, which is to stick it inside a womans vagina. If a man decides he'd like to stick it inside a mans bottom, then this man is partaking in an unnatural act which goes against the evolutionary change which brought about man and woman cohabitation. Here ends my lesson on the acts of sexual reproduction and man and womans existance together in a natural cohabit environment.
|
|
#29
10-06-2004, 06:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
the illusion of fire is so perfect that it burns http://www.terror.ca
|
|
#30
10-06-2004, 11:56 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The only thing that WOULD be natural these days is if we were all living in caves barely starting fires and hunting and gathering....that argument makes no sense to me..... Quote:
|
 |
|
|
