|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Halloween movie is your favorite? | |||
| Halloween |
   
|
17 | 70.83% |
| Halloween II |
  
|
3 | 12.50% |
| Halloween III |
  
|
1 | 4.17% |
| Halloween 4 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Halloween 5 |
  
|
1 | 4.17% |
| Halloween 6 |
  
|
2 | 8.33% |
| Halloween H20 |
|
0 | 0% |
| Halloween Resurrection |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#11
10-18-2004, 11:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
1st.
The results for this poll are kind of obvious though. 
|
|
#13
10-19-2004, 04:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is the general derision of Halloween 3: Season of the Witch down to it being a bad horror movie, or because it does not feature the unstoppable killer Michael Myers, I wonder?
The Invasion of the Body Snatchers-style conspiracy theme, the sharp-suited corporate robots, "8 more days 'till Halloween!" and the diabolical engines at work in those masks that turn kids' heads into masses of ghastly writhing insects all work well and make this a memorable horror film indeed. Cannot help thinking it would be better appreciated under an entirely different title, but you can't blame producer John Carpenter for attempting to divert the Halloween series away from endless resurrections of his once scary bogey man.
|
|
#14
10-19-2004, 05:33 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Hello
Yes it is an obvious vote pattern because as said before Halloween 1 was and possibly still is the best Horror movie to me it is at least :D they were all good except for 3 but everyone knows that :D it might have been a good movie if they didnt shove it in the Halloween megaverse but that was there own fault nice poll by the way :D see y'all
Wolfy
__________________
Treat every day like it is your last for all you know you could be struck down by a Flying toilet seat
|
|
#15
10-20-2004, 04:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
So if you begin watching Halloween 3 for the first time after the start credits, it can be a good film?
Are horror icons like Myers really that essential to today's audience? Or is it just considered impudent of a director/producer to release a different film under the banner of an established series? Perhaps some viewers of Halloween 3 feel cheated that the movie is not what they expected... Fortunately they changed the name of Zombi 2 in some territories to Zombie Flesh Eaters (originally touted as a "sequel" to Romero's Dawn of the Dead/a.k.a. Zombi) or that might have been shit, too. Seen Demons 3: The Ogre? Now there is a good example of a straightforward cash in on a respected name - the producers' idea not Lamberto Bava's - with a bland and forgettable movie, save for nice cinematography and score.
|
|
#16
10-21-2004, 05:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
BTW, the first Halloween is my favorite.
|
|
|
|
