|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#123
08-31-2004, 11:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Because, it doesn't matter if we have an ugly president? lol:p
__________________
...  If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance...Baffle 'em with bullshit My Karma ran over my Dogma God WAS my co-pilot...But, we crashed in the mountains and...I had to eat him I'm suffocating in what's become of me... The rancid remains of what I used to be 
|
|
#124
08-31-2004, 11:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
miss america has 50 choices because there is one contestant per state. We dont get a presidential candidate per state, nor do we want one. could you imagine Dan Quayle running for PRESIDENT? We dont need GW's intellectual INFERIOR running...
__________________
Some misguided people decided I was funny enough to pay. See if they're right: http://www.cracked.com/members/Vodstok/ (I tweet pretty hardcore, too)
|
|
#125
08-31-2004, 11:56 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
...
__________________
|
|
#126
08-31-2004, 12:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I know that there's 50, 1 from each state, I also realize that 50 Presidential candidates would be too many, but it was just to invoke thought. Nader is a 3rd party, but he doesn't receive equal air time by any means. There should be 5 or 6 candidates, all with a realistic shot at winning and all with equal air time and coverage. They need to show us some options and make us feel like they have a chance or people won't vote for them because they thinkit's a wasted vote!
|
|
#127
08-31-2004, 04:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
 Well...... at least we know who he's voting for.
|
 |
|
|
