Quote:
Originally Posted by Straker
Is it really a quandry that is necessary to resolve through a leap of faith though?
|
In the context of the theory Cheebacheeba was describing, I explained how I figured it contradicted a mutually exclusive logic, which I called a quandary. The logic I lay out is objective reality is constant because it's from a single constant source.
I'm applying my life long experience, the evidence of this existence, to our speculation of what lies after death. It's odd you would label that a 'leap of faith', but Cheebacheeba's speculation that it's different that current reality (as I understood it) you did not consider a 'leap of faith'. Is it because I mentioned 'God' that makes 'leap of faith' come to mind?
I mean, clearly stating there's no hell or no god, when we can't know if either exist, is a blunt statement of faith/belief. Obviously we all come to conclusions based on the totality of our life experiences. I take it 'leap of faith' didn't enter your mind when you read those responses. Or did it? Kind of interesting, if I was understanding you correctly. = )