Quote:
Originally Posted by fuglystick
So first, you want to disregard the science, and second, you want to classify homosexuality as a disease. You insist that homophobia is a matter of "hard wiring" (without providing any evidence, as requested), but the evidence that homosexuality is biological you disregard out of hand. Tell me, do you have calluses on your knuckles from pacing around your cage on them?
Come back with some proof to back up your position, or don't bother coming back at all. I'm not going to waste time on someone who lets his ass speak for him.
|
I never " just" disregarded your Scientific" evidence. I just said what the main stream science community says. To find out why people are hard wired to be homophobes. Go research why people have green eyes or blond hair. It's the same principal.
One more thing. I find amusing about your post.
You use the NIMH epidemiological research as proof as homosexuality, being a natural occurrence. Then say. What i have described homophobes as sociopaths. Yet both homosexuals and sociopaths. Have high levels of NIMH .
Yet one section of society having these high levels is seen as proof that their condition is natural. And the other group. Well people speak of cures and treatments.