Guess I'll keep fighting the good fight.
I know you're not actually asking the same question that most people do, Ginger:
"omg wtf wheres mikael lawlz omg whyd u call it halloween what a stupid movie it suxxors"
Which, I'm assuming basically translates to: "Why did they make a Halloween movie without Michael Myers in it?"
I know that's not the question your asking, but before anyone jumps into the thread and asks it I'll just go ahead and explain.
The Halloween series was intended to be original movies that came out every year or so that deal with Halloween and things that happen on the holiday. Michael Myers was never intended to be the franchise villain. However, it seems everyone in the world thought that was the case, and a Halloween movie without Michael didn't go over very well, hence they brought him back.
Now, on to your question, Ginger. Halloween III is not a terrible movie. I'm assuming 90% of the bad rap comes from people not knowing the above when they first see it. It's nothing to right home to the folks about, but it's good cheesy fun. The Silver Shamrock theme song will drive you mad. As far as it being bad just because Michael Myers isn't in it, no. I think a lot of people would agree that IV & V might have been better if it weren't for Michael Myers.
__________________
|