Quote:
Originally posted by Vodstok
hoo boy, here we go.....
Only 2 chuds, second one was actually supposed to be funny. Think critters or gremlins, but far worse than those could ever hope to be.
Exorcist 2:
Linda Blair is possesed by Pazuzu AGAIN.Richard burton is trying to exorcise him this time. Talks to Darth Vader about Locusts, because he was the kid mentioned in the first movie when the preists are discussing father Merrin's experience with exorcism.
Bunch of crap happens, utterly lacks anything that made the first one work. If it werent for the fact that the plots of both sequals to the exorcist were written by the same guy as the original (William Peter Blatty), i would place them in the same category as the Jaws sequals, which were stillborn.
The first exorcist had nothing to do with a posessed statue. The statue at the beginning is representative of the demoan that posseses Reagan.
The origianl is about a struggle between good and evil, fought in the body of a 12 yr old girl. It also represented a test of faith and ultimate redemtion for Father Karras. the second was an attempt to capitalize on it's popularity. It was pigeon shit soaked in cheap beer, spilled on pork flavored jello.
|
She's possesed? She seems fine to me? What the fuck, that doesn't make any sense! Then how do they goto the house and she's posessed...yet...she isn't.
Fuck this movie.
And Exorcist IV comes out in April I believe. That's all I know.