Quote:
Originally posted by Vodstok
It was still better than Quentin Taratino spitting on and threatening a guy because the magazine he worked for pissed him off...
Successful or not, that guy is just a nerd....
Anyway.
Watched "INside the Actors Studio" with Edward Norton today. He is awfully harsh when he criticizes himself. He doesnt seem to think he is as great as the rest of the world does, apparently, which is good. He just loves to act and hopes he keeps learning how tro get better.
And this from a guy who was nominated for an oscar for his first movie role ever.
|
getting hit in the face with a phone can break your nose - not spit - but yeah although i love his work, i'd probably beat the shit out of tarantino if i had to listen to his yap going all day ...
as much as i like the same stuff he does for the same reasons, he's a little mouthy poser jerkoff based on what i've seen of him in interviews.
re Edward Norton ... you'll find this interesting ...
there is a super cool guy interviewer David Giammarco
(who has written a book on James Bond) that used to be on the radio station i listened to ...
these guys are super neutral, bordering on sucky - you have to be to be a successful interviewer around these super egos ...
he went on record on the radio saying Edward Norton is the only guy he'd never interview again - he was a lotal jerk asshole.
self centred prick.
for fight club he interviewed brad pitt and norton together and where pitt was gracious - norton was a complete scumbag ..
it's unheard of for a guy like Gimmarco to say something like that - so it gives you an idea of how these actors remain actors - especially when there's a camera on them ..