Quote:
Originally posted by Deposable
I am open for opinions and views. Right wingers are known for only listening to the sound of their own voice. Do I make it clear where I stand, yes. Is having a strong opinion narrow minded, sure it is.
|
Democrats and rebulicans do the same thing here. They both have their minds set before any given issue even arises.
Quote:
see, how you fail to mention England. Which I was referring too in my original post.
|
That's because I was pointing out where you were inaccurate. England's currency
is stronger than ours, so there was no need to mention it. You had it right.
Quote:
I call the whole Republican Party as Nazi's. So if they are all Nazi's, he must be Hitler. Not a great comparison but I use that reference because of their beliefs not the whole "Killing Jews". They are against human choice and Pro-Control like the Nazi's were. I guess fascist is a better word.
|
Calling them fascist would be MUCH more appropriate than calling them nazis in my eyes.
Quote:
The same thing happens to people in the U.S. The loophole's in HMO's kills people all the time. HMO's cover this but not that. Our Healthcare system is just as fucked up as Canada's but least everyone is equal. There is not blatant classism in Canada.
|
I have nothing good to say about HMO's here in the US. IF there are bigger crooks than politicians (That's a big IF), it's them. All I was really saying there was that the Canadian 'free' healthcare system isn't nearly as great as I often hear it made out to be.
Quote:
Pleeassee :rolleyes: You gotta stop acting like your bipartisan. You clearly lean to the right. If someone praised George Bush, you wouldn't think twice. But if someone is speaking against him or our government (besides yourself), you wouldn't think twice about jumping on your high horse.
|
Obviously, since we are forced to only have 2 parties to select from, people are naturally forced to gravitate to one side or the other depending on the issue. I lean right on some issues and left on others. But in the overall scope of things, I realize they are both crooked parties controlling out government. They refuse to allow any third parties to even get into the race with any decent chance of winning. If Nader ever had any shot of winning, he'd have had my support in a heartbeat, but he didn't have a chance because the Dems and Repubs keep him out. (He wasn't even on the televised debates or even the ballot in some states.) Anyways, you should practice what you preach because you've been hanging from Clinton's dong this whole thread while saying that you are bipartisan too.
Quote:
What Bill Clinton did was a Moral decision. Not being wholesome or trustworthy is getting votes from the "Blind Moral voters", then exploiting the people of 9/11 for a cause of War. Then recalling soliders to duty from the first Iraq war stating they didn't "Complete their services". Leaving thousands of families without fathers and mothers. And you can say having affair is "untrustworthy".... ? Only to his wife it is.
|
The military is comprised of volunteers, a massive amount of which signed up AFTER 9-11 knowing damn well they'd be going to combat.
Quote:
If Clinton lied under oath is debatable from which side you look at it. Undeserving of the Witch hunt Republicans caused. Also, it seems very unimportant compared with the mess we have TODAY.
|
BR already covered this. It's not debatable. He lied under oath and then admitted it later on. He should have been impeached.
Quote:
Lil Kim did lie under oath. Also, I believe it was a violent crime. correct ? which she was protecting her friends. Bill Clinton was only trying to save his own ass from his Wife. haha, I am sure you could understand why.
|
Lying under oath, no matter what you are lying about, is called perjury. They both commited exactly the same crime.
Quote:
Like I said before, Clinton was a perfect president COMPARED to Bush. Just depends which issue is more important. Lying about getting a BJ or exploiting a horrible event for your own benefit.
Here we go again :cool:
|
To my knowledge, Bush hasn't commited any felonies while in office. Clinton did. Clinton also never had to deal with half the shit Bush did. It's a matter of opinion, but I wouldn't say either one of them are ANYWHERE near a perfect president no matter who you compare them too. (Except maybe Hitler.)
