She never did it for me.Too glamourous. I always went for the down home type.
Always Maryanne over Ginger.

That's another thing I love...skinny chicks are unhealthy looking

My question is does beauty alone merit so much worship? I don't think so. If she was some ugly hick you'd be more likely to throw stones at her then discuss the "something" she had. That's because that "something" was just looks.

I meant to type chick but hick is funnier/more insulting so I shall leave it.

ohhh newb, you cant compare ginger to marylin .. she was a pale imitation ..

i know what you're saying though ...normally i feel the same way .. but she had a magic ..

it was the little girl innocense that she had with the glamour looks... irrisistible combination for me ...


normally i love the sexy european look .. dark and sultry ... but marylin is an exception ... Raquel Welch was exeptional as well ..

no ! it was more than the looks ... it was her aura .. for lack of a better word ...
the looks certainly were captivating ,, but it was more than that ... for me anyway ..


and i wouldnt throw stones at a skinny ugly hick ..

I dont find that many people to be ugly - at least on the outside ...

Thank you again......always beating me to it:p

I don't think anything merits worship, admiration maybe but I don't think anyone deserves to be worshipped.

i agree ..

but some people you cant help adoring :)

Now your talking...a young Raquel Welch....she was both glamourous and kind of down home at the same time.
Although she seems to have turned into a bitch in her older years.

http://www.borehamwoodtimes.co.uk/_i...91776.full.jpg

i dont know about her personality .. but holy crap - she's like sophia .. getting more beautiful with age