Glitter.

LMAO!!!! you know after the studio helped fund that movie, it bombed SO bad, that they wanted her out of her record contract...


They wanted to get rid of her SO bad that they paid her 10 MILLION dollars to boot her off....damn.....

If only someone would pay me that kinda money to go away....

Ummmmmmm.... the question is here, who would watch it in the first place just to find out it sucks shit..........WHY!!!!??????:confused:

it's at blockbuster and i've thought about renting it a few times.. is it worthwhile ?

the devonsville terror is definitely one of the worst horror movies i've seen....

maybe it's not so much that 28 days later sucked. it just didn't live up to the hype. everyone kept saying it's so scary. Decent movie-not really scary. Same thing with the ring.

i personally believe that 28 days later and the ring rely on quality home theatre systems... they need to be very dynamic.. and quite loud.. that's where a lot of the scares come from

I didnt like "The Haunting" remake really. actually aggrevated me sorta...

AGREED!!! I personally love that alot more movies are using UNIQUE scares with audio now....its a nice touch....the jump scare can only be used so many times:rolleyes: ....

i liked 28 days later too. I remember when i was walkin into the movie theatre to go see it, i was looking at the movie poster for it, and these 2 hefty ladies walked by, and told me not to watch it because it was so bad. But i enjoyed that and the ring very much. Also one of the most influential movies using sound scare tactics was TCM with the chainsaw against the metal. Still that noise scares the shit outa me!

TCM was a superb movie in the use of sound production scare tactics... also, a very very wonderful film score