PR3SSUR3 |
04-16-2007 01:05 PM |
I don't think the 'it wasn't me' stance can justify apathy in this issue.
I also honestly do not believe it is punishment to not be allowed to broadcast 'nigger' to the masses and continue to get paid for it.
There are those who do not think it is common sense and decent to refrain from glaringly offensive racial remarks because their own agendas - i.e. 'shock jock', 'comedian who pushes boundaries', 'thought the microphone was off' - are more important. The same people of course who think the blacks, the Jews, the Tasmanian Aborigines should be over it by now.
So what to do - quietly and respectfully discuss these views, this forward thinking in a rational manner through the right channels? Or start bellowing 'nigger' and 'nappy-headed ho' from the rafters in a tirade/slip of the tongue and try and explain the whole thing away as 'not racist!' when so many people get offended and careers are in jepardy?
If we all need to move on from past atrocities, perhaps the burying (but not banning) of provocative words relating to such repression would help. Of course as well as broadcasters, that might apply to some urban blacks themselves who now see 'nigger' (or 'nigga') as their own term. Though some would argue they have earned this exclusive right...
(...and others would say they should be over it, and everyone should be allowed to be a Nigger Guy, Gal or Kid.)
:cool:
|