Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Latest Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=35)
-   -   Recent Acquisitions. (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11318)

crabapple 11-19-2007 07:31 AM

March of the Wooden Soldiers (1934)
The Fog (2006)

alkytrio666 11-19-2007 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crabapple (Post 648171)
The Fog (2006)


Why, Crabs? Why?!

newb 11-19-2007 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alkytrio666 (Post 648176)
Why, Crabs? Why?!

Good question....that movie is poo-nuts!

Disease 11-19-2007 08:33 AM

I would have to recieve monthly payments for the rest of my life to keep The Fog remake in my collection!

crabapple 11-19-2007 12:15 PM

I keep tellin' you guys. The Fog 2006 IS NOT THAT BAD.

It ain't a masterpiece, and it ain't better than the original.

But I don't think it's anywhere near as bad as all the other remakes we've seen recently. It's watchable. And it has Selma Blair. And fairly decent effects. It's fun to watch. I give it at least a 5 if not a 6.

And the loaded DVD cost two dollars (!) at Big Lots. So I grabbed it to replace the 99 cent VHS I already had.

Freak 11-19-2007 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crabapple (Post 648254)
I keep tellin' you guys. The Fog 2006 IS NOT THAT BAD.

It ain't a masterpiece, and it ain't better than the original.

But I don't think it's anywhere near as bad as all the other remakes we've seen recently. It's watchable. And it has Selma Blair. And fairly decent effects. It's fun to watch. I give it at least a 5 if not a 6.

And the loaded DVD cost two dollars (!) at Big Lots. So I grabbed it to replace the 99 cent VHS I already had.

I agree that's it's not a bad film at all.There's been a hell of alot worse.And you can't beat 2 bucks.

Disease 11-19-2007 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crabapple (Post 648254)
I keep tellin' you guys. The Fog 2006 IS NOT THAT BAD.

It ain't a masterpiece, and it ain't better than the original.

But I don't think it's anywhere near as bad as all the other remakes we've seen recently. It's watchable. And it has Selma Blair. And fairly decent effects. It's fun to watch. I give it at least a 5 if not a 6.

And the loaded DVD cost two dollars (!) at Big Lots. So I grabbed it to replace the 99 cent VHS I already had.


Seriously, you own it on VHS and DvD... :confused:

crabapple 11-19-2007 02:09 PM

Aw, come on. Make some popcorn, sit back and watch it without thinking about how cool the original is. I liked the original film, it's one of my favorites. But the remake has enough good moments to make it watchable.

There's a thing or two that I DON'T like, but I somehow ignore that stuff.

Disease 11-19-2007 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crabapple (Post 648284)
Aw, come on. Make some popcorn, sit back and watch it without thinking about how cool the original is. I liked the original film, it's one of my favorites. But the remake has enough good moments to make it watchable.

There's a thing or two that I DON'T like, but I somehow ignore that stuff.

Popcorn may make it a little bit better, but I consider it the worst remake of recent times, just a horribly shite movie!

I'm glad some one likes it though...:p

the_real_linda 11-20-2007 08:07 AM

arthur and the invisibles
the color purple
anchorman
doom
stranger than fiction
rescuers down under
the pursuit of happyness

some bring it on film and home alone for my sister, if she enjoyed the fourth one then she NEEDS to see the original.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 PM.