Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Upcoming Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   28 Days Later Sequel? (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2007)

_Leatha_Face_ 01-05-2004 10:14 AM

i'd go c it if it was american made and there was alot more money Put into it than the first 1

Ritualistic 01-08-2004 03:31 PM

I can definately live without a sequel to this movie...

ShamSham04 01-08-2004 04:44 PM

Gonna be hard for me to resist seeing this. :rolleyes:

Not. The first was freaking horrible.

darth_ed 01-20-2004 01:47 PM

28 days before
 
the sequal is more of a prequal set from day one we see the mad rush of ppl leaving the citys going 2 the air ports and follows a familys strugel to try and suvive the first 28 days its rumord to end in the church n we all know what happens there!! i carnt wait it will have a totaly diffrent feel to it

Digital Murders 01-20-2004 02:26 PM

The only reason why the movie did well is because in the trailer and on the commercials they said some bullshit like "Scariest movie of the year!" "The scariest movie since The Exorcist!!"

So that's why it made money.

29 Days Later....No.

Make it stop.

KRUGERKID13 01-20-2004 02:44 PM

why make a sequal to such a terribal "zombie" flick give me night of the living dead any day.

VoodooBob 01-29-2004 02:18 AM

While you're waiting....
 
While you're waiting for the 28 days sequel, sate your appetite with LONDON VOODOO - a new indie British horror with music by SIOUXSIE & THE BANSHEES' STEVEN SEVERIN and his new group, featuring Arban Ornelas, DARLING HATE.

I enjoyed 28 Days Later but was a bit disappointed with the ending from about when they met the army guys in the mansion. No disappointment here though. Check it out as it does the festival circuit this year starting in LA in March, NY in April and Las Vegas in July.

www.londonvoodoo.com


Rob

Signs515 01-30-2004 06:58 AM

Digital Murders
Quote:

The only reason why the movie did well is because in the trailer and on the commercials they said some bullshit like "Scariest movie of the year!" "The scariest movie since The Exorcist!!"
It did well because it was a good movie and a lot of people enjoyed it.

Vodstok 01-30-2004 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Signs515
Digital Murders


It did well because it was a good movie and a lot of people enjoyed it.

Presicely. Just because you hated it doesnt mean it sucked. Unless you are referring to Spawn the movie, which sucked a long, engorged donkey cock.

28 days later was great, and tied up well. A "prequal" thingy would be intersting, but they should make that a tv special or something. I dont think it would do all that great in theaters.

I really liked the first one, though. it was gritty. That black dude in the window freaks me out...

predfan 02-01-2004 11:56 PM

i thought 28 days later was an average movie, not as good as it was hyped IMO but ok. i dont think a sequel would be a good idea, i dont see what plot they would have.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 PM.