Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Classic Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Worst Horror Movie Ever...... (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18567)

The_Return 10-30-2005 04:30 PM

Jigsaw. Sweet Lord, makes House of the Dead look like The Shining. At least HotD was coherant! Despit obviously having NO budget, this movie wouldnt have sucked under any circumstance, believe me

The STE 10-30-2005 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fred Krueger
HOTD's budget is the main reason why it has to be considered worse. They had alot to work with, and I just don't understand how they thought that pile of garbage could entertain us.
Nope. It sounds like the problmes with House of the Dead were at the script level. Could've had Christian Bale, Ray Liotta, and had Ryuhei Kitamura direct, if the script is bad then the script is bad.

The_Return 10-30-2005 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
Nope. It sounds like the problmes with House of the Dead were at the script level. Could've had Christian Bale, Ray Liotta, and had Ryuhei Kitamura direct, if the script is bad then the script is bad.
How can you say things like that about a script full of classic lines like this:

Bad Actor #1-You did all this to become immortal. Why?

Bad Actor #2-To live forever!


Now it takes real genius to come up with lines like that!

noctuary 10-30-2005 06:43 PM

Okay, okay... Now I've seen one that may just give HotD a run for its money. Hood of the Living Dead. I could only watch about half of it, so it may pick up a lot at the end, but what I saw was pretty dire.

bwind22 10-31-2005 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by noctuary
Okay, okay... Now I've seen one that may just give HotD a run for its money. Hood of the Living Dead. I could only watch about half of it, so it may pick up a lot at the end, but what I saw was pretty dire.
No it doesn't pick up at the end. Hood of the Living Dead was every bit as terrible as it sounds, but again, we come back to the budget. Hood of the Living Dead was made on a next to nithing budget where as House of the Dead had a major studio backing them.

gorefreak 10-31-2005 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Return
How can you say things like that about a script full of classic lines like this:

Bad Actor #1-You did all this to become immortal. Why?

Bad Actor #2-To live forever!


Now it takes real genius to come up with lines like that!

LMAO! :D I forgot about that. Even though it's unintentionally hilarious, it's so bad it's a strain to watch that crapfest.
Quote:

Originally posted by bwind22
No it doesn't pick up at the end. Hood of the Living Dead was every bit as terrible as it sounds, but again, we come back to the budget. Hood of the Living Dead was made on a next to nithing budget where as House of the Dead had a major studio backing them.
Budget has nothing to do with it. I've seen movies with a low budget that really made a very watchable, atmospheric film. Look at the first Gingersnaps. That was one of the best werewolf films to come around in the long time. Now that they had a larger budget the last two movies were okay at best, but rather dry. Seems that sometimes people think that the budget will make the movie, when it's the acting, storyline and scares.

Jacob Singer 10-31-2005 05:08 AM

A real bad movie was Faust an spanish production that tries to copy Spawn comics......Same producers fo Dagon (Fantastic factory).....no coment

Maerlyn 10-31-2005 05:20 AM

Faust was really a bad movie, but far from being among the worst, i suppose.

Jacob Singer 10-31-2005 05:25 AM

...and how could be worst???? Just imposible

Maerlyn 10-31-2005 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jacob Singer
...and how could be worst???? Just imposible
Look at the title. :rolleyes:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:22 AM.