Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Horror.com General Forum (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Oscar Nominations are out (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3625)

avenger00soul 01-27-2004 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam The Egg
I posted about the non-Will Smith part, too, 00
I see that. Cool (I didn't actually see BBII, I was just using that as an example). You just called me out on the wrong thing earlier.

Dr.Kelvinstein 01-27-2004 09:39 AM

I'm not even so sure POTC is really any better than BB2. If you're the kind of person that likes to watch digital effects and shit blow up, they both deliver the goods. If anything, Ron Shelton's dialogue was better than the stuff in Pirates. I mean, hell, they both sucked, but if you had to pick one over the other on merits of being well made....

Look past Depp's performance, and there was no way I could have sat through that crap.

hellfire1 01-27-2004 09:39 AM

when exactly is the ceremony airing so i can maybe try and catch it on cable over here ?

Sam The Egg 01-27-2004 09:40 AM

actually, the will smith part was the latter of the two

avenger00soul 01-27-2004 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam The Egg
actually, the will smith part was the latter of the two
I meant for calling me out b/c you thought...that I thought the movie itself was nominated.

Sam The Egg 01-27-2004 09:45 AM

but you were talking about the movie being nothing but a summer blockbuster. That has no baring on the performance. The movie could be a shitty January leftover movie and if the performance is good enough for a nomination then it's good enough for a nomination.

avenger00soul 01-27-2004 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam The Egg
but you were talking about the movie being nothing but a summer blockbuster. That has no baring on the performance. The movie could be a shitty January leftover movie and if the performance is good enough for a nomination then it's good enough for a nomination.
"It was just a summer blockbuster, no more, no less" was just my opinion on the movie. That didn't have anything to do with Depp's performance, I just threw that in there. I did say "what was so special about Depp" which was talking about his performance. Sorry for the confusion on that part. I just didn't see anything tremendous about Depp in that film and I think Dr. K has already answered why the nomination was given.

Sam The Egg 01-27-2004 09:52 AM

Although that might not be why. There were talks of him getting the Dark Horse nomination back when the movie came out.

It doesn't matter anyways, we all know Bill Murray will get the win

Sam The Egg 01-27-2004 09:54 AM

how about next we talk about what DIDN'T get nominated for hardly anything. Namely Big Fish. No Man of the Hour nomination? WTF?!

avenger00soul 01-27-2004 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam The Egg
Although that might not be why. There were talks of him getting the Dark Horse nomination back when the movie came out.
I can see it as the "dark horse" thing too. I really expect Murray to win anyway.

Edit: And Sam the Egg does too.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:15 PM.